<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perl: Old and crufty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-old-and-crufty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-old-and-crufty/</link>
	<description>software development et al.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 04:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Underhill</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-old-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>David Underhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonporritt.com/?p=95#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I wanted you to know how much I enjoyed your "Old and Crufty" post.  I have been writing code professionally for over 15 years and for personal enjoyment since the late 70's.  I started copying programs in basic out of book on a old TRS-80 model III.  During all my years, I have tried to write great code the first time but you are right, anyone that cares about the code they write will always re-write it better the next time than the last.  
I have always believed that a language is a language.  There are of course syntactical procedural differences between them but a good programmer can write good code in any language.  In all my years of learning the newest, coolest language, I have found that they are all more the same than different.  I think the measure of a language is if it is still doing it's job effectively which is to convert the requirements given to the programmer into machine code which satisfy those requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted you to know how much I enjoyed your &#8220;Old and Crufty&#8221; post.  I have been writing code professionally for over 15 years and for personal enjoyment since the late 70&#8217;s.  I started copying programs in basic out of book on a old TRS-80 model III.  During all my years, I have tried to write great code the first time but you are right, anyone that cares about the code they write will always re-write it better the next time than the last.<br />
I have always believed that a language is a language.  There are of course syntactical procedural differences between them but a good programmer can write good code in any language.  In all my years of learning the newest, coolest language, I have found that they are all more the same than different.  I think the measure of a language is if it is still doing it&#8217;s job effectively which is to convert the requirements given to the programmer into machine code which satisfy those requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
