Comments on: Perl Survey Results: US Perl Mongers http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/ software development et al. Tue, 13 May 2008 08:20:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Jason http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/#comment-10 Jason Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:45:33 +0000 http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/#comment-10 @Kirrily: True, but that spike at 10 years of experience is the percentage of people who participate in Perl Mongers, not the number of people. That is, over 80% of the people who indicated 10 years of experience have participated in the past year, compared to only about 40% for both 9 and 11 years. @KD: Hmm, that is interesting. Thanks for sharing your observation. @Kirrily: True, but that spike at 10 years of experience is the percentage of people who participate in Perl Mongers, not the number of people. That is, over 80% of the people who indicated 10 years of experience have participated in the past year, compared to only about 40% for both 9 and 11 years.

@KD: Hmm, that is interesting. Thanks for sharing your observation.

]]> By: kd http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/#comment-9 kd Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:09:09 +0000 http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/#comment-9 Hmm, there's an interesting apparent function on the perl mongers participation by age group chart. Essentially the closer to the central (mean|median|mode) age, the more likely is closer community involvement. Thanks for this by the way :-) Hmm, there’s an interesting apparent function on the perl mongers participation by age group chart. Essentially the closer to the central (mean|median|mode) age, the more likely is closer community involvement.

Thanks for this by the way :-)

]]> By: Kirrily Robert http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/#comment-8 Kirrily Robert Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:56:27 +0000 http://www.jasonporritt.com/perl-survey-results-us-perl-mongers/#comment-8 You see spikes at multiples of 10 years (and to a lesser extent, multiples of 5) for both "years programming" questions. I think people are just rounding their numbers. You see spikes at multiples of 10 years (and to a lesser extent, multiples of 5) for both “years programming” questions. I think people are just rounding their numbers.

]]>